0
Real-time scanner that automatically detects Opening Range Breakout setups and alerts when VWAP, EMA, and Fibonacci confluence conditions align across multiple timeframes.
Added Dec 23, 2025
39 signals
Day traders spend hours manually plotting ORB levels, monitoring VWAP/EMA alignment, and calculating Fibonacci retracements across timeframes while fighting emotional bias and missed entries. This leads to inconsistent execution, calculation errors, and significant opportunity cost from constant screen time.
Detailed solution approach available for premium members.
Market timing analysis available for premium members.
After the opening range formed, price stayed below both EMA and VWAP, keeping the bias clearly bearish. We then got a strong break below the ORB low with solid displacement, not just a wick, but real acceptance lower. Instead of chasing, I waited for the pullback into the golden zone (0.5â0.618). The retrace stayed below VWAP and EMA, which confirmed sellers were still in control. I entered short inside that zone, placed my stop at the 1.0 fib, and targeted a 2:1 RR. Ezi
After the opening range formed, price stayed below both EMA and VWAP, keeping the bias clearly bearish. We then got a strong break below the ORB low with solid displacement, not just a wick, but real acceptance lower. Instead of chasing, I waited for the pullback into the golden zone (0.5â0.618). The retrace stayed below VWAP and EMA, which confirmed sellers were still in control. I entered short inside that zone, placed my stop at the 1.0 fib, and targeted a 2:1 RR. Ezi
Today I traded the 5-minute ORB on MNQ. From the open, price was trading below both VWAP and the EMA, so my bias was clearly bearish. After the ORB broke to the downside, I looked for a pullback using Fibonacci. The impulse moves were relatively small and choppy, which made it harder to get a clean fib retracement entry. It wasnât the most textbook setup, but the overall context still favored shorts. I entered on the retrace with my stop placed around the 0.7 fib level. The move continued lower fairly quickly and delivered a fast 2:1 R. Not the cleanest structure, but solid execution Ezi
Today I traded the 5-minute ORB on MNQ. From the open, price was trading below both VWAP and the EMA, so my bias was clearly bearish. After the ORB broke to the downside, I looked for a pullback using Fibonacci. The impulse moves were relatively small and choppy, which made it harder to get a clean fib retracement entry. It wasnât the most textbook setup, but the overall context still favored shorts. I entered on the retrace with my stop placed around the 0.7 fib level. The move continued lower fairly quickly and delivered a fast 2:1 R. Not the cleanest structure, but solid execution Ezi
I normally donât trade the Asia session, but this time I decided to give it a try. From the start, price was clearly above both the EMA and VWAP, so the bias was bullish. After the opening range formed, price broke to the upside. I waited for the retrace, but it wasnât as deep as I normally require. Instead of staying patient, I didnât want to miss the move and decided to enter anyway, a panic buy, if Iâm being honest. To manage the risk, I kept my stop loss wide, giving the trade enough room to breathe, and I stuck to a 2:1 risk-to-reward despite the less-than-perfect entry. Structurally, nothing had broken: price remained above EMA and VWAP, and bullish momentum stayed intact. The trade played out, but the lesson remains clear. Even when the outcome is positive, execution still matters. Entering out of FOMO isnât part of the plan. Next time, if the retrace isnât clean, Iâll let it go. Especially during a session I donât normally trade. There will always be another set up I hope. Ezi
+75 more signals