I've been thinking a lot about why co-founder matching is broken. Most platforms are one-sided... technical founders browse profiles like a job board, or non-technical founders post ideas and wait for someone to apply. Both miss the point. Real partnerships form when two people independently choose each other based on mutual fit, not when one person pitches and the other evaluates. So I'm building Mock Draft. Dual preference co-founder matching where both sides set their preferences anonymously before either sees the other. A match only happens when both people independently signal interest. No public rejection. No pitching into a void. Anonymity removes bias so you evaluate based on values, work style, communication, and what you're actually building together... not name, photo, or school. Why I'm building this: co-founder breakups are the #1 startup killer, and most happen because of misaligned expectations, values, or working styles... not skills. Dual preference forces alignment BEFORE introduction. And as someone who's been through recovery and built in mental health, I know how much anonymity matters when you're putting yourself out there vulnerably. Looking for a technical co-founder to build this with me. Here's what I bring as the GTM side: \- 10+ years in tech sales and business development across SaaS, security, and healthcare \- Deep network of founders, investors, advisors, and operators through Boardy partnerships \- Experience taking products from zero to early traction through founder-led outbound and community building \- Background in partnership sourcing, demand gen, and account management across multiple industries What I need from you: \- Ability to build MVP and iterate fast \- Comfort with privacy-first architecture (anonymity is core, not optional) \- Interest in solving human connection problems, not just tech problems \- Work style and communication that...

I've been thinking a lot about why co-founder matching is broken. Most platforms are one-sided... technical founders browse profiles like a job board, or non-technical founders post ideas and wait for someone to apply. Both miss the point. Real partnerships form when two people independently choose each other based on mutual fit, not when one person pitches and the other evaluates. So I'm building Mock Draft. Dual preference co-founder matching where both sides set their preferences anonymously before either sees the other. A match only happens when both people independently signal interest. No public rejection. No pitching into a void. Anonymity removes bias so you evaluate based on values, work style, communication, and what you're actually building together... not name, photo, or school. Why I'm building this: co-founder breakups are the #1 startup killer, and most happen because of misaligned expectations, values, or working styles... not skills. Dual preference forces alignment BEFORE introduction. And as someone who's been through recovery and built in mental health, I know how much anonymity matters when you're putting yourself out there vulnerably. Looking for a technical co-founder to build this with me. Here's what I bring as the GTM side: \- 10+ years in tech sales and business development across SaaS, security, and healthcare \- Deep network of founders, investors, advisors, and operators through Boardy partnerships \- Experience taking products from zero to early traction through founder-led outbound and community building \- Background in partnership sourcing, demand gen, and account management across multiple industries What I need from you: \- Ability to build MVP and iterate fast \- Comfort with privacy-first architecture (anonymity is core, not optional) \- Interest in solving human connection problems, not just tech problems \- Work style and communication that complemen...

I've been thinking a lot about why co-founder matching is broken. Most platforms are one-sided... technical founders browse profiles like a job board, or non-technical founders post ideas and wait for someone to apply. Both miss the point. Real partnerships form when two people independently choose each other based on mutual fit, not when one person pitches and the other evaluates. So I'm building Mock Draft. Dual preference co-founder matching where both sides set their preferences anonymously before either sees the other. A match only happens when both people independently signal interest. No public rejection. No pitching into a void. Anonymity removes bias so you evaluate based on values, work style, communication, and what you're actually building together... not name, photo, or school. Why I'm building this: co-founder breakups are the #1 startup killer, and most happen because of misaligned expectations, values, or working styles... not skills. Dual preference forces alignment BEFORE introduction. And as someone who's been through recovery and built in mental health, I know how much anonymity matters when you're putting yourself out there vulnerably. Looking for a technical co-founder to build this with me. Here's what I bring as the GTM side: \- 10+ years in tech sales and business development across SaaS, security, and healthcare \- Deep network of founders, investors, advisors, and operators through Boardy partnerships \- Experience taking products from zero to early traction through founder-led outbound and community building \- Background in partnership sourcing, demand gen, and account management across multiple industries What I need from you: \- Ability to build MVP and iterate fast \- Comfort with privacy-first architecture (anonymity is core, not optional) \- Interest in solving human connection problems, not just tech problems \- Work style and communication ...