So actually having a mature approach to AI would, I'm answering my own question, help prevent some of these things from happening. So I can totally see and understand why having a kind of framework around suitability for different models to do different things for different people would make a huge amount of sense. And I think just getting people to be open about using these things and using it in the right way, not, not, I came up against this wonderful phrase by a lady called Sol Rashidi, who calls herself the first chief AI officer. And she's got wonderful content. She talks about AI atrophy and saying that you can just treat this stuff to outsource your thinking. It's so easy now to generate anything. Write me a business case. It'll be 30 pages long. It'll take two minutes. You don't do any thinking for that. It's going to be very mediocre. And all you're doing is you're just pushing the work somewhere else. So I think if people are worried about people adopting AI in those types of ways, they're worried about the mediocre output, then it's a risk. But if you go down the route of, well, let's help people use the right tools for the right jobs and use it for brainstorming. Don't outsource your thinking. Use it to critique. Use it as a collaboration partner, as a mentor, these types of things. Then I think people will instinctively know through use, oh, OK, maybe I shouldn't upload this information. And I think you just sort of remove that concern through education and engagement. I think this is why that one of the most future-proof skills is critical thinking. It's the ability to question everything. Even the feedback that you get back in mouse might sound super intelligent, like it's produced this 30-page business plan. But you still have to have the nails to be able to say, well, yeah, I kind of see where you're getting at, but that's not the market that we're aiming for and because blah, blah, blah. So you still have to reasonably, I don't think you can fully delegate anything and suppose that it's the master of everything. Yeah. Is that a fair comment? I mean, yeah, I would agree. I guess that people talk about it, AI as a great sort of multiplier tool. But what's the multiplying? If you don't put any effort in, you know, you just put in a one-line prompt, right in your business case about X, you're going to get very average outputs.

My copy editor, GEM doesn't say anything about rewriting it or suggesting ideas. It just says, proofread this for grammar, spelling, and clarity. Do not rewrite it. Do not rewrite anything. Just tell me the changes to make, because I am a better writer than you. So we don't want AI influencing our thoughts, our writing. Why would you want to outsource the thing that makes you uniquely you? Another way to think about it is like when you shallowly think of something and then outsource the rest to AI, you're not making your own ideas come to life. You're making other people's ideas come to life. So if you use AI sparingly, you won't get left behind.