A SaaS? platform that continuously tests LLM? apps, agents, MCPs, and AI workflows for prompt injection, data leakage, and adversarial abuse.
Added Jun 9, 2026
Medium opportunity (73%)
Loading score details
Companies building LLM?-backed applications are hiring specialized security engineers to manually assess prompt injection, model abuse, data leakage, and risks across agents and AI stack components. These threats are new, fast-moving, and hard to validate with traditional application security tools, especially when systems are non-deterministic and connected to enterprise data or tools.
The product provides automated offensive testing for AI-enabled systems, including red-team scenario generation, prompt-injection probes, agent abuse simulations, data-exfiltration checks, and model/API? boundary testing. It produces actionable risk reports, regression tests, and trust-layer policy recommendations that security and AI engineering teams can run before launch and continuously in CI/CD.
Enterprises are rapidly deploying LLM? APIs?, self-hosted models, agents, MCPs, and AI-powered features while job postings show a clear need for dedicated AI security expertise. Security teams need repeatable tooling because hiring offensive AI security specialists does not scale across every product team and release cycle.
Trend snapshot pending
No matched competitors yet
Showing 1-20 of 82 signals
The Austin-based startup broadly still sells what it used to in 2023, but Sestito told TechCrunch that the biggest change it's had to make was to extend its existing products discovery, runtime protection, attack simulation, and supply chain security to address prompt injection, agent manipulation, and malicious tool use. Sestito said inference is still inference, so whether it's on a traditional machine learning model, whether it's Gen AI, whether it's an agentic work stream, a lot of our technology still applied. So really, we haven't had to pivot, but we've had to grow our scope from traditional modeling to Gen AI to agentic. Sestito addressed that runtime security has especially become a priority as AI deployments grow common across businesses and likened it to traditional endpoint detection and response solutions, but specifically for AI.
OWASP testing guide right now AI pen testing large language models are the scope your rag pipe apps are the scope your AI co-pilots autonomous agents and machine learning models so similar attacker mindset but adaptive for AI so adaptive for AI so prompt injection testing model extraction and inversion attacks data poisoning and training and or embeddings adversarial input crafting agent tech tool abuse Now what are the common vulnerabilities Sensitive data data leakage Sensitive data leakage via prompt jail breaking guardrails Sensitive data leakage via prompt jail breaking guardrails Manipulating embeddings leading to false output Now next we have mapping threats to frameworks Right so we have few frameworks for The three which I have written Lindo Now very first one which we have Miter atlas Miter atlas Miter atlas Now Miter atlas is specifically for Miter atlas right so atlas is a
I’ve been working on LLM/agent security for a while now, mostly around prompt injection, jailbreaks, leaks, tool abuse, and where the actual security boundary sits once a model starts using tools. Getting accepted into Anthropic’s Cyber Verification Program gave me a bit more room to push that work further, and I’ve been gradually turning it into **Plimsoll**. It’s an open-source agent skill for red-teaming LLM apps and agents.
Go beyond the grade and inspect the evidence behind this opportunity.
Job ads
See which companies and roles are investing in this problem.Podcast evidence
Read the exact transcript passages behind the idea.Google Trends
Explore search interest, history, and momentum over time.